Enhancement Yield and Productivity of Snap bean by Eco-Friendly Applications under Salinity Stress
Asian Journal of Plant and Soil Sciences, Volume 8, Issue 1,
Page 85-99
Abstract
Saline soils are impeding plant growth, necessitating the exploration of novel methods to enhance the resilience of plants, particularly those that are sensitive, such as snap bean. So, two field experiments were conducted under saline conditions during the two successive winter seasons of 2021 and 2022. Experiments were lead under split plot design with three replicates and three nitrogen fertilizer rates Vz;100% of the recommended mineral N (RD-N), 75% RD-N+ Rhizobium inoculant (Bio-N) and 50% RD-N+ Bio-N as the primary plots and four amino acids as foliar application treatments (control, cysteine, arginine and proline) as the sub plots. The effect of the treatments and their interaction on growth, yield and yield components of snap bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Nebraska was investigated. After harvesting, available N in the experimental soil was determined. The results attained could be summed up as follows: 75% RD-N+ Bio-N compared to the other nitrogen fertilizer rates, achieved the highest values for all studied parameters. Amino acids foliar applications reduced the adverse effect of salinity on snap bean and the superior one was proline. The interaction between 75% RD-N+ Bio-N and proline implemented the maximum levels for the snap bean plant's vegetative growth parameters, yield and yield components. In the soil, the highest residual nitrogen (mg kg-1) was found in the treatment where 75%RD-N+Bio-N and no foliar amino acids was applied. Economically, the application of 75% RD-N+ Bio-N and foliar proline treatment could be a good substitute for other treatments and a practical choice for increasing agricultural output and farmers' revenue.
- Bio fertilizer
- proline
- arginine
- cysteine
- salinity
- snap bean
How to Cite
References
El Sheikha AF, Allam AY. Taha M, Varzakas T. How does the addition of biostimulants affect the growth, yield and quality parameters of the snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)? How is this reflected in its nutritional value?. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:776.
Rashwan EM, Faiyad RM, El-Mahdy RE. Sustainable management of kidney bean plants by soil application of humic substances and foliar application of molybdenum. Env. Bio div. Soil Security. 2020;4:381-390.
Teferi MF, Tesfaye B, Woldemichael A, Debella A. Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to deficit irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer and relationships between yield, yield component and protein content. International Journal of Agronomy; 2022 Article ID 4148983, 10 pages.
Gutama AD. Review: Effect of rhizobium on the yield of leguminous plants. Journal of Plant Biotechnology Research. 2022;3(1):48-60.
Kumar S, Sindhu DSS, Kumar R. Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Current Research in Microbial Science. 2022;3:100094.
Kellman AW. Rhizobium inoculation cultivar and management effects on the growth, development and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand; 2008.
FAO. Extent and causes of salt-affected soils in participating countries. Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt-affected soils. FAO-AGL website; 2000.
Dawood MFA, Sofy MR, Mohamed HI, Sofy AR, Abdel-Kader HAA. Hydrogen sulfide modulates salinity stress in common bean plants by maintaining osmolytes and regulating nitric oxide levels and antioxidant enzyme expression. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2022;22:3708–3726.
Tareq Sh, Mannan A, Al Mamun A, Hossain S, Higuchi H, Abdul Karim. Salinity induced changes in growth and physiology of field crops. Bangladesh J. Ecol. 2021;3(1):1-9.
Hasanuzzaman M, Md RH Raihan, Ch. Masud AA, Kh. Rahman F, Noworz M, Rahman K, Nahar, Fujita M. Regulation of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plant under salinity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(17):9326.
Kocira A, Lamorska J, Kornas R, Nowosad N, Tomaszewska M, Leszczyuska D, Kozlowicz K, Tabor S. Changes in Biochemistry and yield in response to biostimulants applied in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy. 2020;10(2):189.
Abd El-Azeiz EH, EL-Mantawy RF, Mohamed ES. Alleviation the adverse effect of salinity stress on soybean cultivars by foliar spraying of arginine. Menoufia J. Soil Sci. 2021;6:343-362.
Faiyad RMN, Abd El-Azeiz EH, El-Mahdy RE. Integrated Management of Nitrogen and Sulfur Sources in Combination with Amino acids Amelioration for Onion Plants Production under Alluvial Soil Condition. J. of Soil Sci. and Agricult. Engin. Mansoura Univ. 2020;11(9):489-496.
Sadak M Sh, Abd El-hameid AR, Zaki FSA, Dawood MG, El-Awadi ME. Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) to cysteine application under salt stress. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2020;44:1.
Mahdi SF, AL-saedy IH Kh, AL-kareemawi, Al-jobouri MD. The effect of foliar spraying with the amino acid arginine on some vegetative and yield for cowpea plant Vigna unguiculatal L. exposed to salt stress. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences. 2023;10(3S):2796-2808.
Hozayn M, Abd el-Monem AA, Abd El-Hamid EM, Abdul Qados AM. Amelioration of salinity stress in mung bean plant by soaking in arginine. J. Applied Sci. Res. 2013;9(1): 393-401.
Hosseinifard M, Stefaniak S, Javid MG, Soltani E, Wojtyla L, Garnczarska M. Contribution of exogenous proline to a biotic stress tolerance in plants: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(9): 5186.
Arteaga S, Yabor L, Díez MJ Prohens, J, Boscaiu M, Vicente O. The use of proline in screening for tolerance to drought and salinity in common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Agronomy. 2020;10:817.
Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part-2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nded. Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison. Wisconsin. U. S. A; 1982.
Klute A. Methods of soil analysis. Part-1: ''Physical and Mineralogical Methods'' (2nd). Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison. Wisconsin. U. S. A; 1986.
Nayek S, Choudhury IH, Jaishee N, Roy S. Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from commonly grown fern species by various extracting solvents. Res. J. chem. Sci. 2014;4(9):63-69.
Elavarthi S, Martin B. Spectrophotometric assays for antioxidant enzymes in plants. In plant stress tolerance. Human Press. 2010;273-280.
Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968;125:189–198.
Weisany W, Sohrabi Y, Heidari G, Siosemardeh A, Ghassemi-Golezani K. Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and plant performance by salinity stress and zinc application in soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant Omics J. 2012;5:60–67.
Gotteni AL, Verioo L, Camerlynch G. Chemical analysis of soil lap of analytical and agro chemistry . State Univ., Ghent, Belgium; 1982.
Walinga I, Van Der Lee JJ, Houba VJ, Van Vark W, Novozamsky I. Plant Analysis Manual. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington. D. C., USA; 1990.
A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis. 18th Ed. Association of official Analytical Chemist, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD, Method 04; 2007.
Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (Eds). Methods of soil analysis, part 3: chemical methods. John Wiley & Sons. 2020;14.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods 6th addition, Iowa state college press. Ams. Iowa, U.S.A.; 1980.
Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed., International Rice Research Institute, College, Laguna. 1984;680.
Reinprecht Y, Schram L, Marsolais F, Smith TH, Hill B, Pauls KP. Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen fixation in common bean production. Frontiers in plant science. 2020;1:1172.
Hussein AM, Benmoussa M. Planting density and dose of nitrogen and potassium as influencing pod characters of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology. 2023;11(4):634-63.
Sathe BA, Gore RV, Rathod RR. Effect of different sources of nitrogen on growth and yield of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Arka Komal. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. 2015;8(4):44-46.
Mbeke AM, Kirui SC, Kibet NC, Welinga AM, Musyoki SK, Nguta CM. Effects of nitrogen application on snap beans production in Koibatek district Kenya. International Journal of Development and Sustainability. 2014;3(5):1013-1025.
Zaki ME, Mohamed MHM, Abd EL-wanis MM, Glala AAA, Hamoda AHM, Shams AS. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers sources and levels on growth, productivity and quality of snap bean grown under greenhouses conditions. The International Conference on Biotechnology Applications in Agriculture (ICBAA), Benha University, Egypt (Conference Online); 2021.
El-Ghamry AM, Baddoor GA, Ghazi DA, Hassanin MMEL. Distribution of nutrients in snap bean plant organs as affected by N, P and K fertilizer levels. Soil Sci. and Agric. Eng., Mansoura Univ. 2017;8 (6):209-214.
Negash A, Tulu S, Getachew E. Yield and yield components of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by N and P Fertilizer Rates at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech. 2018;6(3).
Kumar A, Singh S, Gaurav AK, Srivastava S, Verma JP. Plant growth promoting bacteria: biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol. 2020;11(1216).
Fahmy MAM, Kandil HBA, Tawfic GA. Enhancing yield and storability of snap bean by bio -fertilizer as a Solutions for climate change-affected sustainable agriculture. Scientific Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;4(3):80-98.
Jabborova D, A. Kannepalli K, Davranov A. Narimanov Y, Enakiev A, Syed AM, Elgorban AH, Bahkali S, Wirth RZ, Sayyed, Abdul Gafur. Co inoculation of Rhizobacteria promotes growth, yield, and nutrient contents in soybean and improves soil enzymes and nutrients under drought conditions. Scientific Report. 2021;11: 22081.
Orozco-Mosqueda MD, Santoyo CG, Glick BR. Recent advances in bacterial phytohormone modulation of plant growth. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(3): 606.
Hanoon MB, Haran MS, Kh. Sahi M. Effect of rhizobium inoculation and nitrogen fertilizers on growth and productivity of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and nitrogen readiness in soil. Int. J. Agricult. Stat. Sci. 2020;16(1):229-236.
Benidire L, Lahrouni M, El Khalloufi F, Göttfert M, Oufdou K. Effects of rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation on growth, nitrogen uptake and mineral assimilation in Vicia faba Plants under Salinity Stress. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 2017;19: 889–901.
Mishra A, Prasad K, Rai G. Effect of bio-fertilizer inoculations on growth and yield of dwarf field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in conjunction with different doses of chemical fertilizers. J. Agron. 2010;9(4):163-168.
Chame SK, Tahmasbi BK, Shah Mahmoodi P, Abdollahi A, Fathi A, Mousavi SJS, Abadi MH, Ghoreishi S, Bahamin S. Effects of salinity stress, salicylic acid and Pseudomonas on the physiological characteristics and yield of seed beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Sci. Agric. 2016;14(2):234-238.
Boteva H, Dintcheva T, Arnaoudov B. Growing of green beans in open field by application of biofertilizers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2021;27(No 3):519–523.
Crowin DL. Climate change impacts on soil salinity in agricultural areas. European Journal of Soil Science. 2020;72(2):842-862.
Hassani A, Azpagic A, Shokri N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nature communications 12, Article number. 2021;6663.
Desoky EM, Ibrahim SA, Merwad AM. Mitigation of salinity stress effects on growth, physio-chemical parameters and yield of snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by exogenous application of glycine betaine. International Letters of Natural Sciences. 2019;76:60-71.
Shabana AI, Mostafa DM, Abd El-Hady MAM. Effect of biological, chemical and physical agents on common bean plant under saline conditions. J. of Plant Production, Mansoura Univ. 2020; 11(7):609-616.
Kaymakanova M, Stoeva N, Mincheva T. Salinity and its effects on the physiological response of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2009;9(4):749-755.
Khan MSA, Karim MA, Haque MM, Islam MM, Karim AJMS, Mian MAK. Influence of salt and water stress on growth and yield of soybean genotypes. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Sciences. 2016;39:167-180.
Ibrahim AMM, Awad AE, Gendy ASH, Abdelkader MAI. Effect of proline foliar spray on growth and productivity of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum, L.) plant under salinity stress conditions. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 2019;46(6A).
Shahbaz M, Ashraf M, Al-Qurainy F, Harris PJC. Salt tolerance in selected vegetable crops. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012;31:303–320.
Singh M, Kumar J, Singh VP, Sh. M. Prasad. Proline and salinity tolerance in plants. Biochem Pharmacol. 2014;3(6).
Hossain MA, Fujita M. Evidence for a role of exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems in mung bean seedlings under salt stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 2010;16:19–29.
Abdelhamid MT, Rady MM, Osman AS. Exogenous application of proline alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plants. J. Hortic Sci. Bio Technol. 2013;88(4): 439–446.
Alyemeni MN, Hayat Q, Hayat S, Faizan M, Faraz A. Exogenous proline application enhances the efficiency of nitrogen fixation and assimilation in chickpea plants exposed to cadmium. Legume Res. 2016; 39:221–227.
-
Abstract View: 1 times
PDF Download: 0 times
Download Statistics
Downloads
Current Issue
Subscription
Login to access subscriber-only resources.