Published: 2021-05-24

Page: 13-22


STEM Science Center, 111 Charlotte Place, Suite 100/Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, USA.


STEM Science Center, 111 Charlotte Place, Suite 100/Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632, USA.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Hydrogen is an important energy carrier vitally used in numerous industrial processes as a refrigerant and an essential gas in superconductor research, ultra-cold condition research, hydrogen-electric car, energy generation, the space industry, and the electricity industry.    Hydrogen gas has been recognized as a favorable form to store solar energy, compared to charging a large capacity battery.  Our objective was to identify the optimal conditions to increase the hydrogen production rate from water electrolysis. The hydrogen production rates were measured by varying the temperature, electrolyte pH, electrode material, electrode distance, electrolyte concentration, and the vertical distance between the electrode and the gas collection beakers were evaluated.  Enhanced hydrogen production was obtained for lower pH solutions, higher temperature electrolyte, having the anode and cathode positioned closer together, and placing the electrodes outside of the beaker. Approximately a 90% enhancement in gas production was achieved by placing electrodes vertically away from the gas collecting beakers. Metallic fabrics displayed promising results over the conventional stiff metal electrode. The metallic fabric electrodes were durable without noticeable erosion and increased initial hydrogen production. Conductive fabrics were very promising due to their high conductivity, low costs, durability, and high surface area.

Keywords: Brownley apparatus, gas production rate, hydrogen generation, metallic fabric electrode, sustainable renewable energy

How to Cite

KIM, T., & LEE, J. (2021). ENHANCING HYDROGEN GENERATION FROM WATER ELECTROLYSIS BY COLLECTING CONFIGURATION AND METALLIC FABRIC ELECTRODES. Journal of Applied Physical Science International, 13(1), 13–22. Retrieved from https://ikprress.org/index.php/JAPSI/article/view/6391


Download data is not yet available.


IRENA, Future of Solar Photovoltaic, A Global Energy Transformation Paper, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi; 2019.

IRENA, Electricity Storage and Renewals: Costs and Markets to 2030, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi; 2017.

Richard Eisenberg, Harry B. Gray and George W. Crabtree, Addressing the challenge of carbon-free energy, PNAS. 2020;117(23): 12543-12549.

Gauhar Mussabek, Sergei A Alekseev, Anton I Manilov, Sergii Tutashkonko, Tetyana Nychyporuk, Yerkin Shabdan, et al. Kenetics of hydrogen generation from oxidation of hydrogenated silicon nanocrystals in aqueous solutions, Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1413.
DOI: 10.3390/nano10071413

David Jure Jovan, Gregor Dolanc. Can green hydrogen production be economically viable under current market conditions, Energies. 2020;13:6599.
DOI: 10.3390/en13246599

IRENA. Hydrogen from Renewal Power: Technology Outlook for the Energy Transition, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi; 2018.

Michel Noussan, Pier Paolo Raimondi, Rossana Scita, Manfred Hafner. Review: The role of green and blue hydrogen in the energy transition – A technological and geopolitical perspective, Sustainability. 2021; 13:298.

Lamiaa Abdallah, Tarek El-Shennawy. Reducing carbon dioxide emissions from electricity sector using smart electric grid applications, Journal of Engineering, 2013, Article ID 845051. 2013;1-8.

IEA, The Future of Hydrogen, International Energy Agency, Paris; 2019.

Raluca-Andreea Felseghi, Elena Carcadea, Maria Simona Raboaca, Catalin Nicolae Trufin, Constantin Filote. Hydrogen fuel cell technology for the sustainable future of stationary applications, Energies. 2019;12:4593.
DOI: 10.3390/en12234593

Karl Verfondern. Nuclear energy for hydrogen production, Energy Technology, Band /Forschungszentrum Julich GMbH. 2007;58.
ISBN 978-3-89336-468-8.

DOE, Quadrennial Technology Review: An assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities, Department of Energy, United States. 2015;1-505.

Jieyang Jia, Linsey C Seitz, Jesse D Benck, Yijie Huo, Yusi Chen, Jia Wei Desmond Ng, et al. Jaramillo, Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 30%, Nature Communications. 2016;7. Article No. 13237.

Coilin Oh Aiseadha, Gerre Quinn, Roman Connolly, Michael Connolly, Willie Soon. Energy and climate policy – An evaluation of global climate change expenditure, Energies, 2011-2018;13:4839.
DOI: 10.3390/en13184839, 2020

Zhifei Yan, Jeremy L. Hitt, John A. Turner, and Thomas E. Mallouk, “Renewable electricity storage using electrolysis, PNAS. 2020;117(23):12558-12563.

Satit Phiyanalinmat, Kanda Whangchai. Effects of NaCl concentration, electrolysis time, electric potential on efficiency of electrolyzed oxidizing water on the mortality of penicillium digitatum suspension, Acta Horticulturae; 2013.
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.973.26

Gidon Amikam, Paz Nativ, Youri Gendel. Chlorine-free alkaline seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(13):6504-6514.

Rajkumar S Patil, Vinay A Juvekar, Vijay M Naik. Oxidation of chloride ion on platinum electrode: Dynamics of electrode passivation and its effect on oxidation kinetics, Indian Eng. Chem. Res. 2011;50:23.
DOI: 12946-12959

Dongnyeok Choi, Kwon-Yeong Lee. Experimental study on water electrolysis using cellulose nanofluid, Fluids. 2020;5(166);:1-12.
DOI: 10.3390/fluids5040166

Sri Haryati, Davit Susanto, Vika Fujiyama. Effects of electrical current, pH, and electrolyte addition on hydrogen production by water electrolysis, Proceedings of the 5th Sriwijaya International Seminar on Energy and Environmental Science & Technology Palembang, Indonesia; 2014.

Nagai N, Takeuchi M, Kimura T, Oka T. Existence of optimum space between electrodes on hydrogen production by water electrolysis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2003;28(1):35-41.