INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE STATE INTERVENTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Main Article Content

SEAN UM

Abstract

The economy is often described as a volatile concept. Many factors are in play that drive either the market up or down. For most people, when the economy goes up, everyone is satisfied. When the economy is down, people are miserable. When the economy is down, this trickles down to ordinary people, causing them to lose their jobs, homes, and other financial assets. Therefore, economists and other social scientists have always wondered what correct approach to is solving economic depression.

There are two major schools of thought in which method is most appropriate in solving economic downfall. One of them implies heavy state intervention, often in the form of financial packages and federal programs to boost individual and corporation welfare. The other group believes that no state intervention is needed and that the market will eventually correct itself through the actions of big companies. Throughout history, both concepts were used by different governmental organizations throughout the world. By researching which method worked best in which scenario in history is the focus of this paper. Determining the proper method to any economic problem can help determine the solution to the current economic trouble the world has.

By contrasting the two methods used in history, economists can realize that only a concoction of the two methods, state-sponsored market and lassiez-faire market, is the key to keeping a working economy. Through some state-sponsored programs, individuals and corporations can fall back safely during a dangerous recession. Some laissez-faire policies would also allow for more economic growth through either a recession or boom. The combination of the two methods can help the economy maintain and grow itself, even during these hard times.

Keywords:
Capitalism, economic growth, industrial revolution, neo-liberalism, state intervention

Article Details

How to Cite
UM, S. (2021). INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE STATE INTERVENTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. Journal of Global Economics, Management and Business Research, 13(1), 37-49. Retrieved from https://ikprress.org/index.php/JGEMBR/article/view/6269
Section
Original Research Article

References

Dizikes Peter. The data speak: Stronger Pandemic Response Yields Better Economic Recovery. MIT News; 2020.
Accessed January 19, 2021.
Available:https://news.mit.edu/2020/pandemic-health-response-economic-recovery-0401

Ghemawat Pankaj, Steven A Altman. The State of Globalization in 2019, and what it means for strategists, Harvard Business Review; 2019.
Accessed January 9, 2021.
Available:https://hbr.org/2019/02/the-state-of-globalization-in-2019-and-what-it-means-for-strategists

Capitalism. Britannica.
Accessed December 18, 2020.
Available:http://www.britannica.com/topic/capitalism

Jahan Sarwat, Ahmed Saber Mahmud, What is Capitalism? Free Markets May Not Be Perfect but They Are Probably the Best Way To Organize an Economy. Finance & Development. 2015;44-45.

Iversen Torben. Economic shocks and varieties of government responses. In beyond varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European Economy, Edited by Bob Hancké, Martin Rhodes, and Mark Thatcher. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007;278-306.

Katz Claudio J. Karl Marx on the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. Theory and Society. 1993;22(3):363-389.

Harvey David. Theorizing the Transition. In the condition of postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 1991;73-188.

Industrial Revolution. History.com.
Accessed January 5 2021.
Available:https://www.history.com/topics/industrial-revolution/industrial-revolution

Chen, James. Industrial Revolution. Investopedia.com; 2020.
Accessed January 10, 2021.
Available:https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/industrial-revolution.asp

Harvey David. Introduction. In the condition of postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 1991;121-124.

Altvater Elmar. Postliberalism or Postcapitalism? Development Dialogue 51. 2009;73-86.

Bonefield Werner. Reformulation of state theory. SAGE Journals. 1987;96-127.
Accessed January 3, 2021.
Available:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/030981688703300107

Harvey David. Fordism. In the condition of postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 1991;125-140.

Jahan Sarwat, Ahmed Saber Mahmud, Chris Papageorgiou. What Is Keynesian Economics? Finance & Development. 2014;53-54.

Palley Thomas I. From Keynesianism to Neoliberalism: Shifting Paradigms in Economics. Foreign Policy in Focus; 2004.
Accessed December 1, 2020.
Available:https://fpif.org/from_keynesianism_to_neoliberalism_shifting_paradigms_in_economics/

New Deal. History.com. Last updated; 2019.
Accessed December 19, 2020.
Available:https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/new-deal

New Deal: United States History. Britannica.com. Last Updated; 2021.
Accessed January 12, 2021.
Available:https://www.britannica.com/event/New-Deal

Amadeo Kimberly. What is late stage capitalism and why is it trending today? The Balance.
Accessed December 14, 2020.
Available:https://www.thebalance.com/late-stage-capitalism-definition-why-it-s-trending-4172369

Glyn Andrew. Challenges to Capital. In Capitalism Unleashed, 1-23. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006;24-49.

Armstrong, Philip, Andrew Glyn, John Harrison. The Great Slowdown. In history of capitalism since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell. 1991,1945, 233-255.

Harvey David. From fordism to flexible accumulation. In the condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1991;141-172.

Glyn Andrew. Austerity, privatization and deregulation. In Capitalism Unleashed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Campbell John L, Ove K. Pedersen, eds. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001.

Labonté Ronald. Neoliberalism 4.0: The rise of illiberal capitalism: Comment on ‘how neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention. International Journal of Health Policy Management. 2020;9 (4):175–178.

Hirsch Joachim. Globalization of capital, nation-states, and democracy. Studies in Political Economy. 1997;54:39- 58.

Harvey, David. Introduction, in a brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. 2007;1-4.

Goldfarb Jeffrey C. What Do You Mean When You Use the Term Neoliberalism? #19/#20-one source

A Question to My American Friends, Colleagues, Students and Comrades on the Academic Left. Public Seminar; 2017.
Accessed January 13, 2021.
Available:http://publicseminar.org/2017/04/what-do-you-mean-when-you-use-the-term-neoliberalism/

Kenton Will. Neoliberalism. Investopedia; 2020.
Accessed December 1, 2020.
Available:https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neoliberalism.asp

Ozgun Aras. Post-fordism, neoliberalism and cultural production. Research Gate; 2013.
Accessed January 2, 2021.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322723836

Edwards, Chris. Margaret thatcher’s privatization legacy. Cato Journal, Winter. 2017;37(1):89-101.

Marsh David. Privatization under Mrs. Thatcher: A Review of the Literature. Public Administration. 1991;69 (4):459-480.

Glyn Andrew. Globalization and International Economic Relations. In Capitalism Unleashed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Glyn, Andrew. “Growth and Stability.” In Capitalism Unleashed, 129-155. New York: Oxford University Press. 2006;77-103.

Iber Patrick. How neoliberalism shapes the global economy and limits the power of democracies. New Republic.com; 2018.
Accessed December 20, 2020.
Available:https://newrepublic.com/article/147810/worlds-apart-neoliberalism-shapes-global-economy

Pettinger Rejvan. Washington consensus – Definition and Criticism, Economicshel.org; 2017.
Accessed December 16, 2020.
Available:https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consensus-definition-and-criticism/

Hurt Stephen R. Washington Consensus.
Accessed December 17, 2020.
Available:https://www.britannica.com/topic/Washington-consensus

Davies, Stephen. Is this Really a Post-Liberal Era? American Institute for Economic Research; 2020.
Accessed January 10, 2020.
Available:https://www.aier.org/article/is-this-really-a-post-liberal-era/

Cecena, Ana E. Postneoliberalism and its Bifurcations. Development Dialogue. 2009;51:33-43.

Glyn Andrew. Welfare and income inequality. In Capitalism Unleashed, New York: Oxford University Press. 2006;156-183.

Pabst Adrian. A post-liberal world? Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute; 2017.
Accessed December 15, 2020.
Available:https://doc-research.org/2017/05/post-liberal-world/

Elbaum Rachel, Patrick Smith. How Theresa May Became the Latest Prime Minister To Be Beaten by Brexit. NBC News.com; 2019.
Accessed January 6, 2021.
Available:https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/brexit-referendum/how-theresa-may-became-latest-prime-minister-be-beaten-brexit-n1009191

Gregg Samuel. The post-liberal right: The Good, the Bad, and the Perplexing. Public Discourse, March 2, 2020. Accessed December 11, 2020.
Available:https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2020/03/60593/

Mueller Benjamin. What is Brexit? And What Happens Next? New York Time; 2021.
Accessed January 3, 2021.
Available:https://www.nytimes.com/article/brexit-uk-eu-explained.html

Radice Hugo. Responses to Globalization: A Critique of Progressive Nationalism. New Political Economy. 2000;5(1):5-19.

Graham Carol. Winners and Losers: Perspectives on globalization from the emerging market Economies. Brookings; 2001.
Accessed January 20, 2021.
Available:https://www.brookings.edu/articles/winners-and-losers-perspectives-on-globalization-from-the-emerging-market-economies/

James Harold. The Highs and Lows of 19th Century Capitalism Are Eerily Familiar. Financial Times; 2019.
Accessed December 28, 2020.
Available:https://www.ft.com/content/feaf4be2-7d56-11e9-8b5c-33d0560f039c

Pyle JL. Economic Globalization and Gender. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2001;4089-4093.
Accessed January 8, 2021.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03937-1