Scalpel or Steroid? A Descriptive Comparison of Two Cases of Oral Mucocele Managed with Surgical Excision and Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide

Sayali Dilip Amrutkar *

Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

Priya Shinde

Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

Ishali Deokar

Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

Manjushri Waingade

Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

Mahesh Chavan

Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aim: The present study describes two cases of lower-lip oral mucocele managed by conventional surgical excision and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and to compare their clinical courses descriptively.

Case presentation: A 35-year-old male presented with a 1.8 × 1.2 cm bluish, fluctuant lesion of two months’ duration. The lesion and adjacent minor salivary glands were excised under local anaesthesia, and histopathological examination confirmed a mucus extravasation phenomenon. A 23-year-old male presented with a 1.0 × 0.8 cm recurrently rupturing and refilling lesion of four months’ duration. In accordance with the patient’s preference for minimally invasive treatment, 0.3 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg/mL) was injected intralesionally.

Results: The surgical site healed uneventfully after suture removal, while the injected lesion regressed progressively and showed complete clinical resolution at four weeks. Neither lesion recurred during six months of follow-up, and no treatment-related complication was observed in the corticosteroid-treated patient.

Discussion: Surgical excision provided tissue for definitive histopathological confirmation but required suturing, analgesics, and postoperative wound care. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide avoided surgery and was well tolerated, but histopathological confirmation was unavailable.

Conclusion: Both approaches were followed by complete clinical resolution in these individual cases. Because only one patient received each intervention and spontaneous regression cannot be excluded, the findings do not establish comparative effectiveness. Treatment should be individualised according to lesion characteristics, diagnostic certainty, patient preference, and follow-up requirements.

Keywords: Oral mucocele, minor salivary gland, surgical excision, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, corticosteroid injection, Case report


How to Cite

Amrutkar, Sayali Dilip, Priya Shinde, Ishali Deokar, Manjushri Waingade, and Mahesh Chavan. 2026. “Scalpel or Steroid? A Descriptive Comparison of Two Cases of Oral Mucocele Managed With Surgical Excision and Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide”. Journal of Case Reports in Medical Science 12 (1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.56557/jocrims/2026/v12i110885.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.