ASSESSMENT OF THE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACES IN ABEOKUTA NIGERIA
Journal of Global Ecology and Environment,
Volume 16, Issue 4,
Recreational open spaces provides recreational areas for residents and helps to enhance the beauty and environmental quality of neighbourhoods. It consists of natural and organized open spaces used for outdoor recreational purposes. This paper examines the physical characteristics of recreational open spaces in Abeokuta Nigeria. In order to achieve this, available recreational facilities of the recreational open spaces in the study area were identified.. Descriptive and Kendall Tau B’s test was used for the analysis, and result showed significant relationship between environmental aesthetics and physical characteristics of ROS in Abeokuta, This implies that the physical characteristics influences the environmental aesthetic quality of the ROS. It also establishes the fact that environmental aesthetic quality has an impact on the patronage of ROS. It is recommended that the environmental aesthetics of recreational open spaces in the study area be improved in order to enhance its patronage.
- physical characteristics
- recreational open space
How to Cite
Omoleke SA. Green space, gender and health: A re-examination of the literature. Bull Environ Pharmacol Life Sci. 2012;1(9):03-11.
Stanley BW, Barbara L, Stark BL, Katrina L, Johnston KL, Smith ME. Urban open spaces in historical perspective: A trans-disciplinary typology and analysis, urban geography Conference on Economic and Conservation in the Tropics: Canada A Strategic Dialogue. The environmental Valuation: Challenges and Practices. 2012;33(8):1089-1117.
Ajayi AO. “A study of urban open spaces and self-rated health in residential neighborhoods of Osogbo, Osun State [Ph.D thesis] submitted to the Department of Architecture. Osun State, Nigeria: Obafemi Awolowo University; 2018.
Broadhurst R. Managing environments for leisure and recreation, London, GBR. Routledge. (Placeholder1); 2001.
Haapala A. On the aesthetics of the everyday: familiarity, strangeness and meaning of place, in the Aesthetics of Everyday Life Light AA, Smith JM, editors. New York: Columbia University Press; 2005.
Obateru OI. Basic elements of physical planning. Penthouse publications (Nig.); 2005.
Roberts G, editor. Langmuir-blodgett films. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
ABD’Razack NTA. 2Martins. VI and Bello: LO; An Assessment of Preference and Behaviour of Minna City Dwellers to Outdoor Recreation; 2013.
Blanc N. From environmental aesthetics to narratives of change. Contemp Aesthet; 2012;10.
Speck A, J, Lydon M. The smart growth manual. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
Dixon JA. Environmental valuation: challenges and practices. A Paper Presented at Duany; 2008.
Officha MC, Onwuemesi FE, Enete IC, Nzeamalu IC. Assessing the Need for Developing and Managing Recreational Facilities in Nigeria IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR -JESTFT) 19ISSN:23192402,pISSN:23192399; 2013.
Parson G. Nature Appreciation, Science and Positive aesthetic. Br J Asthetics. 2002;46:279-95. Saito Y. Everyday aesthetics. Philosophy. 2001;25(1):87-95.
Smardon RC. Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation. Landscape and Urban planning. 1988;15(1-2):85-106.
Van der Zanden. Regulating, cultural, habitat & supporting Green linear elements; 2013.
Fadamiro JA, Atolagbe AMO. Urban environmental sustainability: A challenge to effective landscaping in Nigeria Dimensi teknik arsitektur. 2006;34(1):44-51.
Daneshpour ZA, Mahmoodpour A. ”Exploring the people’s perception of urban public parks in Tehran”,in Schrenk M, Popovich V, Engelke D, Elisei P, editors; 2009.
Simon FR. Prevalence and usage of open recreational spaces in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria A [Ph.D thesis] Covenant University, OgunState, Nigeria. Ota: Canaan Land; 2015.
Mitchell D. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford press; 2003.
Parsons AG. Non‐functional motives for online shoppers: why we click. Journal of Consumer marketing; 2002.
Berleant A. Aesthetics and environment: variations on a theme. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2005.
Galindo P, Rodriguez JA. Environmental aesthetics and psychological wellbeing: Relationships between preferences judgements for urban landscapes and other relevant affective responses. Psychol Spain. 2000; 4(1):13-27.
Rafaeli A, Vilnai-Yavetz I. Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organization science. 2004; 15(6):671-86.
Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM. Public space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
Al-Hagla K. Towards a sustainable neighborhood: The role of open spaces. Int J Archit Res. 2008;2:162-77.
Duany J. The Orlando Ricans: Overlapping identity discourses among middle-class Puerto Rican immigrants. Centro Journal. 2010; 22(1):85-115.
Waldheim C. The landscape urbanism reader. Princeton Architectural Press; 2006.
Jennings I, Newman P. Cities as sustainable ecosystems. Principles and Practices; 2008.
Asika N. Research methodology in the behavioural sciences. longman Nigeria plc; 1991.
Zucker P. Town and Square: From the Agora to the Village Green; 1959.
Crouch DP. The historical development of urban open space. In: Taylor L, editor, Urban open spaces. New York: Rizzoli. 1981;7-8.
Cranz G. The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America. The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America. 1982.
Madanipour A. Public and private spaces of the city. New York: Routledge; 2003.
GiGL. Open space categories; 2021.
Bonett DG, Wright TA. Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika. 2000;65(1):23-8.
REAL CORP. Cities 3.0 – smart, Sustainable, Integrative: strategies, Concepts and Technologies for planning the urban future. Proceedings of the an International conference held in Sitges, Barcelona. 2009;22-25:(687-8).
Shores KA, Scott D, Floyd MF. Constraints to outdoor recreation: A multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Leis Sci. 2007; 29(3):227-46.
Abstract View: 105 times
PDF Download: 5 times