EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT EDIBLE COATING TREATMENTS ON POST-HARVEST QUALITY OF GUAVA FRUIT DURING AMBIENT STORAGE

PDF

Published: 2021-05-22

Page: 32-44


SUDHIR PRATAP

Department of Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144411, India.

DEEPIKA SAXENA

Department of Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144411, India.

SIMPLE SHARMA *

Food Technology and Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab-144411, India and I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar - Kapurthala Highway, VPO - Ibban, Kapurthala-144603, Distt. Kapurthala, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The effectiveness of different coating treatments at different concentrations had been investigated in the present work against guava fruits. The present experiment includes 40 combinations of coating materials viz. Aloe Vera gel [1/3(25%), 1/2(33%) and 1/1(50%)], Corn starch (0.5, 1, and 1.5 %), Calcium chloride (0.5, 1, and 1.5 %), Chitosan (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 %) for increasing the shelf-life of guava at ambient conditions. The effect of coating material on physiological loss in weight, vitamin C, acidity, soluble solids, and SS/acid ratio was observed. The different treatments showed variation in physiological and biochemical variables. Coated fruits delayed the increase in weight loss, soluble solids content and retained greater titratable acidity, vitamin C contents than control. Out of these 40 treatments, treatment T1 [Aloe vera 1/3(25%)], T2 [Aloe vera 1/2(33%)], T10 (chitosan 0.1%), T11 (chitosan 0.2%), T12 (chitosan 0.3%), showed the best result as compared to other treatments.

Keywords: Guava, coatings, storage, treatments, aloe vera, chitosan


How to Cite

PRATAP, S., SAXENA, D., & SHARMA, S. (2021). EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT EDIBLE COATING TREATMENTS ON POST-HARVEST QUALITY OF GUAVA FRUIT DURING AMBIENT STORAGE. Journal of Advances in Food Science & Technology, 8(1), 32–44. Retrieved from https://ikprress.org/index.php/JAFSAT/article/view/6387

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.